Ramraj Yadav v. State of U.P

Court No. - 72 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49979 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramraj Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akash Yadav,Devbratt Yadav,Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Devendra Mani Tripathi,Vivek Kumar Singh Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶1List has been revised.

¶2Heard Sri Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Anjani Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶3Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 0301 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 395, 412 and 506 IPC, Police Station Badlapur, District Jaunpur, during the pendency of trial.

¶4As per prosecution case, the named accused persons Srikant Yadav, Achhey Lal and Sandeep and two unknown persons are stated to have assaulted and injured Lal Sahab Yadav and Harshit Yadav by firing at them.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. On 17.10.2023, at about 10:00 am, incident is stated to have occurred in broad daylight despite that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He is the resident of one and the same village and is father of the co-accused Srikant Yadav. He has been falsely implicated in the case owing to the recovery of pistol from the premise belonging to the applicant. The name of the applicant has come up subsequently in the statements of witnesses. The inordinate delay in nominating the applicant speaks volume of the applicant having been falsely implicated. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. It is further stated that there is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 18.10.2023. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶7Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶8Let the applicant-Ramraj Yadav, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶9In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶10It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Priya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad