- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35831/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35831 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajveer Singh Dhangar And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
¶2The present writ petition is preferred, inter alia, with following reliefs :- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents concerned to upload the caste certificates of the petitioners bearing Nos. 144134003419, 144134003435 and 144144000038 respectively on the authorised website of the Government for proper verification.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents concerned to take necessary and effective action of representations dated 16.03.2023 and 10.08.2023 moved by the petitioners which are still pending consideration till date."
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, at present, he is confined his prayer that his representations may be addressed by the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee expeditiously.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to keep the matter pending consideration. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, we dispose of the present writ petition asking the District Magistrate/Collector, District-Mathura may reprieve the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Suffice to indicate that the court has not adverted into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.