- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 41232/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41232 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition and states that the petitioners have alternative efficacious remedy of appeal against the impugned order. Confronted with the said fact, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the limitation for filing the appeal has expired, hence the same could not be entertained. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with direction to the authority concerned that the if the appeal is preferred by the petitioner within 15 days from today, the same may be considered by condoning the delay sympathetically. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 Pravesh Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.