- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 35472/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35472 of 2023 Applicant :- Hari Prasad Maurya And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rikheswar Pratap Singh,Mohd Ikrar,Mohd. Isa Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.06.2023 as well as the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.1678 of 2017, N.C.R. no.202 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504 IPC, P.S. Nawabganj, District Allahabad.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the reasons on account of which the applicant failed to appear before the trial court were beyond his control and the applicant have every intention to appear before the court concerned and participate in the proceedings of the trial.
¶4Learned AGA appearing for the State opposed the prayer.
¶5Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the impugned order as well as the materials brought on record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the prayer made in the application is refused.
¶6However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to move an application for cancellation of N.B.W. before the court below within four weeks from today, which shall be heard and decided in accordance with law. For a period of four weeks from today, effect and operation of non-bailable warrant issued against the applicants shall be kept in abeyance.
¶7With the aforesaid observations, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 1.12.2023//Sanjeet High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.