Anjana Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29691 of 2021 Petitioner :- Anjana Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Sharan Giri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ram Sharan Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Kumar Baranwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 4.

¶2The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents to comply the order dated 30.05.2019 passed by respondent no.3 i.e. Annexure no.3 to this writ petition."

¶3When the matter was taken up, learned Standing Counsel came up with the specific instructions through which it is transpired that against the order dated

30.05.2019, a restoration application has been preferred which is still pending to be adjudicated.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the extent that the respondent no.3 may be directed to expedite the disposal of Restoration Application No.T202007110301276, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is still pending to be adjudicated.

¶5Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel showed his agreement to the extent that only a direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to decide the restoration application seeking recall of the order dated 30.05.2019 within stipulated time.

¶6Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Restoration Application No.T202007110301276, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.

¶7With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 1.12.2023 Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad