- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Case no.
- A227 10738/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10738 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Kalawati Devi Respondent :- Tej Pratap Singh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Dwivedi Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
¶2In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
¶3After some arguments counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the effect to direct the court below to decide the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 14 of C.P.C. dated 18.01.2023 in Original Suit No. 192 of 2020 (Sanjeet Singh and another vs. Tej Pratap Singh and others).
¶4In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid application expeditiously strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 2.12.2023 Swati High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.