Ajay Pratap v. State of U.P

Court No. - 72 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45005 of 2023 Applicant :- Ajay Pratap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶1At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that he does not propose to file rejoinder affidavit in response to the counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State.

¶2List has been revised. Heard Sri Rajnish Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Jitendra Kumar Jaiswal, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 207 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of I.P.C. and Sections 65/66 of IT Act, Police Station Kurara, District Hamirpur, during the pendency of trial.

¶4It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. His name has come up in the confessional statement of arrested co-accused person Raghvendra Nishad, who was named in the FIR. The said statement is not admissible in evidence. A false recovery of 32 Atm cards and a note of Rs.500/- along with a mobile phone have been foisted upon the applicant. Learned counsel has also stated that the co-accused person, Raghvendra Nishad, has already been enlarged on bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated

22.11.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 49575 of 2023. He further submitted that since the case of the applicant is at par to the co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.07.2023, having no criminal history. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial.

¶5The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However, the aforesaid factual aspects of parity to the co-accused and of no criminal history of the applicant, have not been disputed by him.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and in light of the judgement passed by this Court in Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P., 1993 Crl.L.J. 938 and the judgement passed by the Apex Court in Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, MANU/SCOR/22410/2021, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

¶7Let the applicant-Ajay Pratap, involved in aforementioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. ii. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. iii. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. iv. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. v. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶9Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶10It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion on the testimony of the witnesses. (Justice Krishan Pahal) Order Date :- 2.12.2023/Siddhant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad