- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Case no.
- WTAX 1237/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1237 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt.Jyoti Somani Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ishan Deo Giri,Sarvesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Devendra Gupta,Gaurav Mahajan Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for Income Tax Department and Sri Devendra Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India.
¶2The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved against the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in not deciding the representation of the petitioner dated 29.4.2023.
¶3Upon hearing the learned counsel for both the parties, we are of the view that the following order may be passed: The respondent No.3, being the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I Department, Civil Lines, Kanpur, is directed to decide the representation dated April 29, 2023, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from date. Upon passing a reasoned order, a copy of the same shall be handed over to the petitioner within ten days. The petitioner is directed to assist in the inquiry to be conducted by the Department.
¶4With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.12.2023 Rakesh (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.