- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 3 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 3990/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3990 of 2023 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Sri S.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashish Nishad, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.5.
¶2The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to respondent no.2 to decide the application/objection under Section 9A (2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act filed by the petitioner in Case No.384 of 2021 (Krishna Kumar another vs. Sanjay and others) within stipulated period.
¶3Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents has no objection to the same.
¶4Considering the above facts and circumstances, the respondent no.2, Consolidation Officer, Shahganj, District Jaunpur is directed to decide the aforesaid application/objection on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either parties.
¶5The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.