VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Nihal Singh v. Consolidation Commissioner of Uttar Pradesh and 5 Others

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 December 2023
Case no.
WRIB 914/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 914 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Nihal Singh Respondent :- Consolidation Commissioner Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Srivastava,Ambuj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard counsel for the parties.

¶2The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with following reliefs :- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to direct the respondent nos. 3 and 4 to correct the confirmed map of second consolidation (1996-1997) of the Village-Pratappur, Pargana-Bhuili, Tehsil-Chunar, District-Mirzapur according to the confirmed map of first confirmed map (1964-65) after asking a survey report from the consolidation authority.

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the revenue authority not to demarcate the plots of any tenure-holders until the confirmed map of second consolidation is corrected."

¶3In response to which, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that he has filed counter affidavit. It is submitted that in pursuance of the report filed by the Tehsildar, as per Section 30 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the Collector found certain mistakes in the map and deleted the same.

¶4Accordingly, the correction may be carried out within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶5With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.