VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ayush @ Ashish @ Chhotu v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
3 December 2023
Case no.
BAIL 48923/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48923 of 2023 Applicant :- Ayush @ Ashish @ Chhotu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.

¶1Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard Sri Anubhav Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Dhiraj Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶3The instant bail application, has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 242 of 2023, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C Police Station-Bichhawan, District-Mainpuri, during pendency of the trial.

¶4Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. There is criminal history of nine cases against the accused-applicant, which has been explained properly in para no. 17 of the bail application, which is levelled by the Police after arrest of only Rs. 4000/- recovered from the possession of the applicant can not be said that this rupees are the part of rupees, which were kept in the ladies purse of the aggrieved person. Learned counsel for the applicant has explained other criminal history in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit. The learned counsel for the applicant further contends that the alleged recovery is false. Learned counsel lastly submitted that the co-accused Rahul @ Panjabi @ Gurujeet has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 34180 of 2023 vide order dated

04.08.2023. The applicant claims parity. He is in jail since

09.06.2023, in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶5Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶6Having regard to the submissions made but without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶7Let the applicant, Ayush @ Ashish @ Chhotu, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that: i. the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. iv. the applicant shall appear before the concerned S.H.O. on any day of first week of every month till the further order of the trial court.

¶8In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Vinod. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.