Prabhunath v. Sri Atul Raghuvanshi, Executive Engineer

Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7267 of 2022 Applicant :- Prabhunath Opposite Party :- Sri Atul Raghuvanshi, Executive Engineer Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Nath Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rishu Mishra Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. The writ Court on 13.05.2022 while disposing of Writ-C No. 12132 of 2022 passed the following order:- "It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that it is respondent No.6, who will take the decision as he is the competent authority. We request the highest authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner and decide the same as expeditiously as possible by passing a reasoned order being cautious of the objection raised by the Mr. Devesh Vikram, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6. as the petition is not maintainable. We have not granting any writ of quo waranto as there are several disputed question of facts. The petition is partly allowed to the aforesaid extent." From perusal of the order, it is clear that writ Court had only directed the opposite party to look into grievance of the applicant and take a decision by passing a reasoned order. A compliance affidavit has been filed on 09.01.2023 wherein it has been stated that order of writ Court has been complied with on

11.08.2022 and claim has been decided. Copy of which has been brought on record as Annexure-1 to compliance affidavit. In view of said fact, as the order of writ Court has been complied with, the contempt application is rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 V.S.Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad