Yogesh Kumar v. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Registrar of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University and Another

Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6026 of 2022 Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Opposite Party :- Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Registrar Of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vivek Kumar Rai Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the contempt application. Sri Ravi Prakash, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the opposite parties is present. The writ Court on 25.01.2022 while disposing of Writ-C No.1031 of 2022 had passed the following order:- "1. Heard Sri Vimal Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Vimal Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent-University and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents through video conferencing.

¶2Petitioner seeks issuance of fresh computerised marksheet for B.Ed Course 2013 with correct enrollment number 08109259 in place of 08104805.

¶3Upon instructions, learned counsel for the respondent-University states that fresh computerised marksheet with correct enrollment number may be issued to the petitioner only if and when the petitioner surrenders the original marksheet that has been admittedly issued to him with wrong enrollment number.

¶4The objection is well founded.

¶5In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present petition pending or calling for counter affidavit.

¶6Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in case, the petitioner files a fresh application for issuance of correct marksheet with correct enrollment number (08109259) alongwith a copy of this order and the original marksheet issued to him with wrong enrollment number (08104805) within a period of two weeks from today, the respondent-University shall make necessary corrections and issue a fresh marksheet to the petitioner with correct enrollment number within a period of two weeks therefrom." Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party states that pursuant to the direction of the writ Court, a revised mark-sheet has been issued to the applicant, copy of which has been place before the Court, which is taken on record. In view of the said fact as the order of the writ Court has been complied with and the revised mark-sheet has been issued to the applicant, present contempt application is rendered infructuous and the same stands dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged. Order Date :- 4.12.2023 SK Goswami High Court of Judicature at Allahabad