- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- WPIL 2602/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2602 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rampreet Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Singh,Vipin Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhinav Ojha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Sudhir Bharti for respondent no.5, Land Management Committee.
¶2The instant public interest litigation has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.4, Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata, District Kushinagar to decide the case Nos.T202205440205834,
T202205440205835, T202205440205836,
T202205440205837, T202205440205839,
T202205440205840, T202205440205841 within stipulated period.
¶3Mr. Abhinav Ojha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents on the basis of the instruction dated
4.11.2023 submitted that 14 cases are pending in respect to plot No. 183M area 0.717 hectare which is recorded as rasta in the revenue record. The particular of the case numbers are as follows:-
(a) T202205440205833 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Munni Devi)
(b) T202205440205834 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Sunil Singh)
(c) T202205440205835 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Ramashankar)
(d) T202205440205836 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Devanand)
(e) T202205440205837 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Ramsurat)
(f) T202205440205838 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Kodai)
(g) T202205440205839 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Sharda)
(h) T202205440205840 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Ayodhya)
(i) T202205440205841(Gaon Sabha Vs. Amarjeet)
(j) T202205440205842 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Keshav)
(k) T202205440205843 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Sitaram)
(l) T202205440205844(Gaon Sabha Vs. Beersen)
(m) T202205440205845 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Phoola Devi)
(n) T202205440205846 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Dayasen) The cases mentioned in the instruction includes the cases which are mentioned in the prayer clause of the writ petition.
¶4In view of the pendency of the cases as mentioned above, the instant public interest litigation is finally disposed of directing the respondent no.4, Tehsildar, Tehsil Hata, District Kushinagar to decide the aforementioned cases according to the provisions contained under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as the rules framed thereunder after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law.
¶5The instant public interest litigation is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.