- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 41101/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41101 of 2023 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Jaishal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Dev Singh Chanchal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 07 of 2012, Computerized Case No. C2012140000982 (Kalpeshwar v. Mangari), under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 within stipulated period.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is opposite party in the revision which is pending since 2012. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
¶4No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi Division, Varanasi to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.