Arvind Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 249 of 2021 Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Sharma Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ram Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present bail cancellation application has been filed by the applicant to cancel the bail of opposite party no.2 in Case Crime No.641 of 2020, under Sections-363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and Sections-3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station-Kasganj, District-Kasganj.

¶3After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the victim and the opposite party no.2 are aged between 17-18 years. They are of the same age. The victim willingly eloped with the opposite party no.2 and entered into physical relation. Thereafter, she has falsely implicated the applicant.

¶4There is no ground for cancelling the bail granted to the opposite party no.2.

¶5The bail cancellation application is accordingly, rejected.

¶6The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the opposite party no.2 as expeditiously as possible, preferable within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Saif High Court of Judicature at Allahabad