- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 41781/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41781 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Srivastava,Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents/Authority concerned especially the respondent no. 2, to make a district level inquiry against the respondent no. 6 by constituting a team with respect to the financial misappropriation of public money in various heads, in accordance with law, within some stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a complainant, who has made complaint against the Pradhan alleging illegality and irregularity in the development work. Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner being complainant has no locus to file such petition, therefore, this petition is not maintainable. In support of his contention, he has relied upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vivekanand Yadav vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2010(10) ADJ 1 (FB) and the judgment of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Ors. reported in 2013(1) ADJ 228. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Arti High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.