VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Radhey Lal v. State of U.P. and 9 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
4 December 2023
Case no.
WRIC 38849/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38849 of 2023 Petitioner :- Radhey Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudheer Rana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard Shri Sudheer Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to take an appropriate action on the representations made by the petitioner, within stipulated time.

¶3In pith and substance, the grievance of the petitioner is that the private respondents have encroached upon the petitioner's land bearing Gata No. 808 area 0.0870 hectare. The petitioner is asking that his representation dated 11.09.2023 addressed to the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance may be decided in the light of the government order dated 01.05.2017, expeditiously.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel very fairly submits that, in case, any such representation is pending, the same would be decided by the concerned authority.

¶5In view of the above, without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the third respondent, Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order in the light of the government order dated

01.05.2017 in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Vijay High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.