- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- A482 39205/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 88 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39205 of 2023 Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Bathla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anothar Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Srivastava,Kumar Sreshtha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant, who is informant in this case seeking direction to the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khurja, Bulandshahr to decide the Criminal Case No.1691 of 2022 (State Vs. Vipin Kumar Gumbar), arising out of Case Crime No.1145 of 2022, under Sections 420 & 406 I.P.C., Police Station Khurja Nagar, District Bulandshahr within time bound manner.
¶3At the outset, learned AGA pointed out that in this case, charge has been recently framed against the accused on 27.09.2023 and there is no delay in trial proceedings.
¶4Learned AGA relying upon the judgement in the case of Shaikh Uzma Feroz Hussain Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2023 Live Law (SC) 978 submits that the relief as sought for by means of this application cannot be granted to the applicant at this stage.
¶5In response, Shri Chandra Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application, therefore, the same may be allowed.
¶6Accordingly, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the application is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 RKM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.