- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39007/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39007 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sanjay Bhati And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Atul Tej Kulshrestha Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
¶1Matter arises out of SARFAESI Act No. 54 of 2002.
¶2The notice under Section 13(2) is described to have been served through registered post.
¶3Prima facie, we are satisfied that the petitioner has adequate remedy of appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
¶4In face of such remedy available, upon objection raised by learned counsel for the Bank, interference claimed is declined. If the appeal remedy is sought within a period of one week from today, the same may be treated to have been filed within time and may be dealt with on its own merits.
¶5With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 SK Srivastava (Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.) . . . (S.D. Singh,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.