- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 42914/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 85 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42914 of 2023 Applicant :- Kapil Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Virendra Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present second bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant in Case Crime No.1138 of 2020, under Sections 306 and 201 of IPC, Police Station Majhola, District Moradabad with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated
10.04.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 21429 of 2021. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is no substantial progress in the trial and applicant is languishing in jail since
14.09.2020 having no criminal history and that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the prayer for grant of bail by contending that no new ground has been taken by the learned counsel for the applicant and all the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant have already been considered by this court while disposal of the first bail application and applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of allegations, gravity of offence and the fact that all aspects of the matter has already been considered while disposal of the first bail application and no new ground has been taken in the present second bail application, I do not find it a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby rejected. Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and all endeavours be made to conclude the trial expeditiously preferably within a period of eight months after receipt of the certified copy of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties subject to full co-operation by the applicant. Any observation made above shall not be treated as any finding on the merits of the case and shall not prejudice the trial in any manner. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 AKT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.