- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 4 December 2023
- Case no.
- WPIL 2742/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2742 of 2023 Petitioner :- Avishant Roshwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 18 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suneel Kumar Mishra,Krishna Kant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Kaushal Kishore Mani Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. Though the petition is ostensibly filed in the public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule
(3A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of the judgement of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition since we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (Donadi Ramesh,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, ACJ.) Order Date :- 5.12.2023 RK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.