- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 39009/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39009 of 2023 Petitioner :- Raj Bahadur @ Raj Bahadur Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Kumar Rai Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct the respondent authorities to disclose the actual payable amount after giving the benefit of Fasal Rin Mochan Yojana and not to take any coercive action against the petitioner and a further prayer to direct the respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 2.02.2023 of the petitioner within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his relief to the extent that a direction may be issued to respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 27.02.2023 within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has no objection to the aforesaid submission. In view of the aforesaid, no useful purpose will be served to keep this writ petition pending and calling for a counter affidavit. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file afresh representation before the respondent-Bank within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order and, if any such representation is filed, the respondent-Bank shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of such representation. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Jitendra/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.