- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Case no.
- CAPL 7426/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 9 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7426 of 2023 Applicant :- Km. Savita Gaur Opposite Party :- Devendra Kumar Pandey, Basic Shiksha Adhikari And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Bhanu Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party. The writ Court on 21.09.2022 in Writ-A No. 50357 of 2016 passed the following order; "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3. The petitioner claims to have been selected on the post of Assistant Teacher in primary school and, according to the petitioner, the marks obtained by the petitioner is above the cut off marks fixed by the respondents. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that till date no appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed a representation dated 5th September, 2016. However, till date no orders has been passed. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 submits that the petitioner may file a fresh representation for redressal of his grievances, which will be considered and decided by the respondent no.2 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced by the parties, it is directed that the petitioner may file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 ventilating his grievances within a period of one week from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no.2 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of." From perusal of the order of writ Court it is clear that a direction was issued to the opposite party for deciding the representation of the applicant which the authority had already done on 24.01.2023, copy of which has been brought on record as annexure No. 1 to the compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party no. 1. As the order of writ Court has been complied by the opposite party, no case for contempt is made out. Contempt application stands dismissed. Contempt notice stands discharged. File consign to record. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Shekhar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.