VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajeev Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 December 2023
Case no.
WRIC 40380/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40380 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Santoosh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Mohan Asthana Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Sagar Srivastava, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Krishna Mohan Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent Bank.

¶2Communication dated 4.12.2023 filed by the learned counsel for the Bank in Court today be kept on record.

¶3Learned counsel for the Bank, relying on paragraph No.3 of the communication, states that if the petitioner deposits 50 per cent of Rs.12,50,000/- plus interest @9.65, then the Bank is ready to receive remaining 50 per cent in two months equal installment.

¶4Paragraph 3 of the instructions is reproduced below: "3) As per the decision of the competent authority, if the borrower commits to deposit 50% of the remaining dues immediately, bank is ready to receive the failed OTS for an amount of Rs.12,50,000 plus interest @9.65 (MCLRY +1%) w.e.f. 18.08.2023 under the binding judicial order of the Court subject to deposit of half of the total remaining amount within two months in two equal instalments without prejudice to the bank's right on adherence to its OTS policy."

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to paragraph 3 of the Communication dated 4.12.2023.

¶6Under such circumstances, we direct the Bank authorities to enter into One Time Settlement as per paragraph No.3 of the Communication within 15 days from date and the payment shall be made by the petitioner in terms thereof. In case of default in paying the amount as per the OTS by the petitioner, it shall be open for the respondent Bank to recover the amount from the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶7With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Kuldeep (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.