Rishikesh Ram v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20249 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rishikesh Ram Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sunil Kumar Misra Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Sri Swapnil Kumar, Advocate, filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 2 today, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶3The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. Issued a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and commanding the respondent No. 2 to regularized and give the other benefits to the petitioner from the date of 01.04.2011 as other employees regularized by the compliance of the U.P. Govt letter No. 3576/ 86-11-338/2010 dated 01.04.2011 sanctioned the post 104 of group C and 410 post of group D and as well as to give the notional benefits-salary with interest from the date of 01.04.2011 to 31.10.2018 and benefits."

¶4Claim of the petitioner is for regularization. Sri Swapnil Kumar, who appears for respondent No. 2, has submitted that petitioner may file a fresh representation for redressal of his grievances before the respondent no. 2.

¶5In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶6The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 2-Chief Executive Officer, Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority, Head Office-Kanpur Nagar, to consider and decide the representation, if any, made by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today along with the certified copy of this order, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not examined the claim of the petitioner on merits. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad