VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dinesh Chandra Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 December 2023
Case no.
WRIC 41971/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41971 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Yadav And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav,Chandreshwer Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Harsh Vardhan Gupta Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.

¶1The petitioners herein have challenged the demand notice dated

13.7.2023 issued by respondent no. 2 levying various charges for sanction of their building plan. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that various charges being demanded by the impugned notice do not fall within the purview of Section 15(2-A) of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 or under Section 35 of the Act and are thus illegal. In support of his submission, he places reliance on the judgment of Supreme Court dated 28.4.2023 in the case of Civil Appeal No. 5645 of 2015 (Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority and Another Vs. Rajesh Sharma and Others).

¶2An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Prayagraj Development Authority in the connected matter, i.e. Writ - C No. 41640 of 2023, annexing therewith an order dated 5.12.2023, by which it has been clarified that even in respect of notices already issued but amount not yet deposited, the PDA would apply the judgment of Supreme Court in Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority (supra).

¶3As the Prayagraj Development Authority has already issued clarification that it would apply the judgment of Supreme Court in Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority (supra) even in respect of notices already issued, therefore we dispose of the instant petition with liberty to Prayagraj Development Authority to issue fresh notice of demand, keeping in view the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority (supra).

¶4As a result, the impugned demand notice dated 13.7.2023 would stand withdrawn in respect of the charges held to be not permissible by the Supreme Court in Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority (supra).

¶5The order has been passed in the presence of Sri Shri Prakash Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Development Authority. (Donadi Ramesh, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, A.C.J.) Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Jaideep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.