Rajendra @ Rajendra Singh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20252 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajendra @ Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Dixit Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "i. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 6 to pay the amount to leave encashment, gratuity, dearness allowance, bonus, arrears, provident fund, arrear of 7th pay commission and other retiral dues with interest to the petitioner along with arrear of pension forthwith. ii. a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 6 to decide the applications of the petitioner dated 06.10.2023,

09.10.2023 and 30.10.2023 pending before him, expeditiously and within the stipulated period."

¶3Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was working as Safai Karamchari in the Nagar Pallika Parishad, Pilibhit and has retired on 30.04.2023 The post-retiral dues of the petitioner has not been released by the Nagar Pallika Parishad.

¶4Sri Devesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Vijay Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 and 6 submitted that though in this regard certain representations have been given by the petitioner, it would be appropriate that the petitioner may give a fresh representation and that may be directed to be considered by the respondent authorities.

¶5In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that respondent No. 6-Executive Officer, Nagar Pallika Parishad, District-Pilibhit may consider and decide the representation, if any, made by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today along with the certified copy of this order, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law.

¶6It is made clear that this Court has not examined the claim of the petitioner on merits. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad