- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 42063/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42063 of 2023 Petitioner :- Gangadhar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Debee Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1.Heard Mr. D.S.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amit Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned Counsel for respondent No.4/Gram Sahaba.
2.The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.3/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Soraon, District-Prayagraj to decide the Case No.11175
of
2023
(Computerized
Case
No. T202302030311175) Gangadhar and others Vs. Hublal and others, under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him within stipulated period.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned suit for partition filed at the instance of of the petitioner is pending since 19.08.2021. He further submitted that copy of the order sheet, which has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 109 (10) of U.P. Revenue Code, Rules 2016.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.3/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Soraon, District-Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 6.12.2023 PS* High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.