VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramesh and Another v. State of U.P

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 December 2023
Case no.
A482 37404/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37404 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramesh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Surendra Nath Yadav Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Surendra Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash charge sheet dated 5.4.2023 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1287 of 2023 (State Vs. Ramesh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 0066 of 2023, under Sections-323, 504, 506, 324 IPC, Police Station-Junavai, District-Sambhal.

¶3The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of causing harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶4From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants at this stage. All the submissions made at the bar, relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.)

¶283The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.

¶5At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants are ready to surrender before the trial Court for obtaining bail and for that some protection may be granted to them.

¶6However considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within four weeks from today and in case he applies for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶7For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, they shall not be arrested in the above case.

¶8With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Junaid High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.