- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 2503/1982
Judgment
Order of Memo of Petition
¶1Heard Sri Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate for petitioners and Sri Gyan Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for contesting-respondents.
¶2Learned counsel for parties are in agreement that this writ petition be disposed of since parties have entered into a compromise.
¶3In aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of. Parties are at liberty to place the compromise before concerned authority within fifteen days from today. The compromise will be taken on record after its verification and thereafter its legal consequence shall follow. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 AK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case details
Parties and counsel
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2503 of 1982 Petitioner :- Smt. Asharfi And Others Respondent :- A.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.M. Singh,Kamlesh Tiwari,R.N. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,C.P. Srivastava,Gyan Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Order on Delay Condonation Applications No. 12/23, 16/23, 18/23, 06/23, 10/23, 08/23 and 1. Heard. 2. Delay in filing substitution applications is explained satisfactorily. It is hereby condoned. The applications are accordingly allowed. Order on Substitution Applications No. 8873/1983, 8247/1983, 7082/1987, 16140/1992, 15040/1993, 13/23, 17/23, 19/23, 07/23, 11/23, 09/23, 15/23 and 05/23 1. Heard. 2. Applications are allowed, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500/- for each applications to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, receipt of which shall be placed on record.. 3. Let substitution be carried out during course of the day.
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.