- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Case no.
- A482 43864/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 45 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43864 of 2023 Applicant :- Sudha Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ranvijay Kumar,Indresh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
¶1Heard Shri Ranvijay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents, and perused the record.
¶2The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with the prayer to quash the non bailable warrant dated 08.11.2023 issued by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, District Mathura against the applicant in Criminal Case No. 498/IX/21 (Computer Case No. 5471 of 2021 arising out of Case Crime No. 034 of 2020 under Sections 323, 504, 427 and 308 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura with a further prayer to stay the effect and operation of the non bailable warrant.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant states that being aggrieved by issuance of non bailable warrant, the applicant has preferred this petition for setting aside the order dated 08.11.2023.
¶4The matter was listed before the trial court several times since
24.08.2021, i.e., on 23.09.2021, 16.10.2021, 03.12.2021,
13.12.2021, 01.01.2022, 10.01.2022, 14.01.2022, 21.02.2022,
25.02.2022, 28.02.2022, 03.03.2022, 16.08.2022, 14.04.2022,
21.04.2022, 21.04.2022, 28.04.2022, 12.05.2022, 26.05.2022,
06.07.2022, 27.07.2022, 08.08.2022, 09.09.2022, 23.09.2022,
27.09.2022, 31.10.2022, 22.12.2022, 06.12.2022, 07.01.203,
11.01.2023, 17.01.2023, 13.02.2023, 28.03.2023, 14.04.2023,
08.05.2023, 18.05.2023, 03.08.2023, 12.08.2023, 05.07.2023,
12.07.2023, 26.07.2023, 26.08.23, 27.08.2023, 28.08.2023,
06.09.2023, 15.09.2023, 21.09.2023, 19.10.2023, 08.11.2023, but neither the applicant appeared before the trial court nor filed any bail application, hence the trial court was forced to first issue bailable warrant and thereafter non bailable warrant against the applicant to secure her presence.
¶5In the foregoing facts, the present 482 Cr.P.C. application is misconceived and devoid of any merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Shiraz (Vinod Diwakar, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.