- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40347/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40347 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramaasare Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nar Singh,Poonam Singh Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2, Tehsildar, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, District Kushinagar to decide the case No. 10479 of 2022 (Kiran Devi Vs. Ramaasare Pandey) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.
¶3Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid mutation case is pending before respondent no.2 for adjudication.
¶4Copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 34 (7) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Tehsildar, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, District Kushinagar to consider and decide the aforementioned mutation case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 7.12.2023/ Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.