- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 20338/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20338 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Sargam Khare Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Ram Krishna Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
¶1On the request of learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead Government Girlds Inter College, Mahoba, District Mahoba through its Principal as respondent no. 7.
¶2Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Sri Ajit Kumar learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel who appears for all the respondent.
¶3In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to respondent no. 7.
¶4The case of the writ petitioner is that she was selected and appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Government Girls Inter college Mahoba, District Mahoba, on 12.3.199, however, owing to its merits he was promoted as Lecturer and an order to the said effect has been issued on 21.11.2023 according placement to the writ petitioner in Government Girls Inter College, Kulpahad, District Mahoba as Lecturer (History). The writ petitioner claims to have represented her cause before respondent no. 3, Additional Director of Education (Government) U.P. Prayagraj, however, the same has not been decided. He seeks to rely upon the para 13 of the writ petition so as to contend that various vacancies are lying vacant against which she can be adjusted. He also cited illustration in the case of other incumbents who have been extended the said benefits.
¶5Learned Additional Standing Chief Standing Counsel submitted that issue with the writ petitioner seeks to raise needs determination by respondent no. 3, Additional Director of Education (Government), Prayagraj, U.P. who shall address to the claim of the writ petitioner.
¶6Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the writ petitioner to approach the respondent no. 3, who shall proceed to decide the writ petition after hearing the affected parties including the institution, within a period of two months.
¶7Needless to point out that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the case. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 S.A. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.