VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Seema v. Saifun Nisha and 14 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 December 2023
Case no.
WRIC 34817/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34817 of 2023 Petitioner :- Seema Respondent :- Saifun Nisha And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Yadav,Mukul Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer to direct the District and Session Judge, Kushinagar to decide the Civil Revision No.23 of 2023 (Seema vs. Saifun Nisha and Others, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against dismissal of the election petition filed by the petitioner, a revision has been filed before District and Session Judge, Kushingar, which is pending, therefore, a direction may be issued to District and Session Judge, Kushingar, to expedite the same, within stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. No useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending in view of the order, which the Court proposes to pass hereunder. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the District and Session Judge, Kushinagar to decide the aforesaid revision of the petitioner, and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, after giving opportunities of hearing to the concerned parties, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, preferably within a period of four months, from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Kalp Nath Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.