- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 6 December 2023
- Case no.
- A482 40690/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40690 of 2023 Applicant :- Vittan Ali And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dileep Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
¶1Short Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 is taken on record.
¶2Heard Shri Ashish Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Dileep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.
¶3The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 17.01.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.1890 of 2018, under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C., Police Station Izzatnagar, District Bareilly.
¶4Learned counsel for the applicant submits that now parties have entered into compromise on 22.08.2023, therefore, in light of compromise between the parties, the criminal proceeding against the applicants may be quashed.
¶5Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has not objected the aforesaid facts and submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, he would have no objection.
¶6Learned A.G.A. has also not disputed the aforesaid facts.
¶7In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.
¶8Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another;
(2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.
¶9The present application is, accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Amit/ADY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.