- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 7 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 32997/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32997 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Punia Jk Jv And Another Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anupam Kumar Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
¶1Heard Shri R.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anupam Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.
¶2The present writ petition is preferred interalia with following relief:- "A. to issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to communicate the discrepancy, if any, to the petitioner prior to take final decision in the tender."
¶3In response to the earlier order, Shri Anupam Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents-North Eastern Railway has placed the instructions, which is taken on record. On the basis of instructions, he submits that the claim set up by the petitioners have already been negated/ rejected by the competent authority.
¶4Confronted with this, Shri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is not inclined to press the writ petition. However, leave may be accorded to challenge the rejection order in an appropriate proceeding.
¶5In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, the petitioners are at liberty to avail the remedy as available in law. Order Date :- 8.12.2023 Kamarjahan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.