- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40806/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40806 of 2023 Petitioner :- Devi Dayal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Srivastava,Abhijeet Kumar Pandey,Smt. Priyanka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that respondent nos. 5 and 6 have encroached over the pathway adjacent to Plot Nos. 132, 129, 128, 127 and 126. The issue in the present petition involves disputed questions of fact which can only be decided on evidence. In case, the petitioner claims the pathway to be a public way, he may file an appropriate application before the Executive Magistrate under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 or may also institute appropriate proceedings before the civil court. It is not a fit case for consideration by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 Satyam High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.