- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37873/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37873 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sonam Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Anoop Singh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Om Prakash Verma,Om Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents.
¶2Present writ petition has been preferred for a direction to accord civil protection to the petitioners.
¶3On the matter being taken up today, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has produced the detailed instructions sent by the Station House Officer, Saraimamrej, Commissionerate Prayagraj, which is taken on record. On the basis of instructions, he submits that the claim of the petitioners is unsustainable and as such the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances as well as the categorical instructions, once we declined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that he is not inclined to press the writ petition.
¶5In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 SP/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.