VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Lakhan v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
10 December 2023
Case no.
WRIC 40699/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40699 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidyanand Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Ballia as respondent no.7 in the writ petition during course of the day.

¶2Heard Mr. Vidyanand Singh, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shridhar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, Counsel for respondent no.6, Gram Sabha.

¶3The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the learned lower Court of Upziladhikari Ballia, Sadar, District Ballia to decide the case No. 188/ 2013-14 (Computerized case No. T202315090302733) (Ram Lakhan Vs. Raghubar and Others) under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950 expeditiously within stipulated time."

¶4Counsel for the petitioner submitted that aforementioned suit under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act filed at the instance of the petitioner is still pending even after expiry of more than 10 years. He further submitted that certified copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that matter is not proceeding expeditiously.

¶5Mr. Shridhar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submitted that suit filed in the year 2013 was dismissed for non-prosecution in the year 2014 and the same has been restored in the year 2023, as such, the delay has been caused in deciding the matter.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances, the instant petition is finally disposed of directing the respondent no.7, Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Ballia to decide the aforementioned suit after framing issues and giving parties to lead evidence in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 11.12.2023/ Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.