Phoola Devi v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37977 of 2023 Petitioner :- Phoola Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sita Devi,Deejya Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Dejya Narayan Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide Case No. 289 of 2016, Computerized Case No.T2016054701289 (Savitri vs. Daya Shankar), under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound period.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide Case No. 289 of 2016, Computerized Case No.T2016054701289 (Savitri vs. Daya Shankar), under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the effected parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad