- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 December 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 47036/2020
Judgment
Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47036 of 2020 Applicant :- Vinod Giri @ Phagu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bashisth Narain Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prakash Veer Tripathi Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
¶1Sri Bashisth Narain Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State are present but none appeared on behalf of the informant even in revised call.
¶2On 22.11.2023, this Court directed the Jailor concerned to submit a report, whether applicant wants to engage another counsel of his own choice or not.
¶3As per the office report dated 23.11.2023, trial of the case has already been concluded on 06.05.2023.
¶4Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant also conceded the fact that trial of the case has already been decided.
¶5In view of the above, it appears that the instant bail application has become infructuous and the same stands dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 KK Patel High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.