- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 40871/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40871 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suhel Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mo. Saif,Qaisar Kamal Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Instructions filed today be kept on record. This writ petition has been filed against the recovery citation dated
10.10.2023. Upon instructions, Sri Rakesh Kumar holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent states that, after the provisional assessment notice was served upon the petitioner, final assessment order has also been passed on
30.09.2022 and on that order recovery was being done. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that neither provisional assessment notice was served upon the petitioner nor any opportunity was given to the petitioner to submit any reply to the provisional assessment notice. Perusal of the final assessment order also shows that the petitioner's case was not considered. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the petitioner be served the provisional assessment notice afresh within a period of ten days from today, to which the petitioner may file reply within next 15 days and after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner final assessment order may be passed within the next one month. Accordingly, the final assessment order, passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, dated 30.09.2022 is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 Pkb/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.