- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 42796/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42796 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Belapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the boundary mark fixed on Plot No. 25 (area 0.046 hectares), which the petitioner claims to be her bhumidhari plot, has been removed by respondent nos. 4 to 6 and no action has been taken by the revenue authorities despite repeated representations made by the petitioner. The petitioner may file a fresh application before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate who, in case the claim of the petitioner is found to be true, shall exercise his powers under Sections 22 and 23 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and that the boundary mark be fixed and shall also ensure that appropriate action under Section 227 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 is taken against the guilty persons. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.12.2023 Vipasha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.