VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Krishna Kumar v. Union of India and 4 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
11 December 2023
Case no.
A227 9922/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 1 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9922 of 2023 Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Pandey,Ram Naresh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dinesh Kumar Misra Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.

¶1Heard Shri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2Notice on behalf of the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 has been accepted by Shri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, learned Central Government Counsel, who has filed memorandum of appearance on 12.9.2023. However, the same is not on record. Office is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. Notice on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 have been accepted by learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Government.

¶3This petition has been filed seeking the following relief: "i. to direct the court concerned/Additional Session Judge/ Ananya Special Judge, E.C. Act, Fatehpur to decide the Misc. case no. 51 of 2007 (Krishna Kumar vs. Union of India & others) within stipulated period as directed by this Hon'ble court. ii. or may pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

¶4A perusal of the miscellaneous case in respect of which the relief sought in the instant petition which is enclosed as Annexure no. 1 to this petition reflects that it is titled Reference No. 51/70/07 (Krishna Kumar vs. Union of India and 4 others) that was filed in the court of the District Judge, Fatehpur under Section 34(2)(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1996') read with Section 3G(6) of the National Highways Act, 1956. In this petition, neither is the award made by the competent authority under sub-section (1) of Section 3G enclosed, nor is the determination of the amount made by the arbitrator under sub-section (5) of Section 3G of the National Highways Act, 1956 filed. It is also not known as to whether the application under section 34 of the Act, 1996 is filed within the prescribed period of limitation and whether the same is maintainable.

¶5Under the circumstances, interference in the afforded petition is declined and petition is dismissed.

¶6Registrar (Compliance) is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned within fifteen days for information. Order Date :- 12.12.2023 A. V. Singh (Jayant Banerji, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.