- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 25344/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25344 of 2023 Petitioner :- Srimant Raje Raghuji Rao Bhosle Chief Trustee Maharaja Bhosle Devasthan Committee Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devi Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harsh Vardhan Gupta,K.K.Rao Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.
¶2The dispute relates to possession over idol of Goddess Ganga, which was initially installed over the Trust property and during road widening the same was kept at the adjacent place. The petitioner is aggrieved that initially the respondent had assured after the end of Ardh Kumbh, the idol would be installed at appropriate place but till date either on account of intervention by the private respondent or the State, the same has not been installed at appropriate place.
¶3Sri S.C.Upadhayay, learned Standing Counsel submits that such disputed fact cannot be pressed in the writ jurisdiction. In case, the petitioner moves an appropriate application before the competent district authorities, definitely, the grievance of the petitioner would be examined and redressed as per law.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending for consideration and without adverting on the merit of the issue, we dispose of the writ petition asking the petitioner to move an appropriate application/representation ventilating his grievance before the Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned within two weeks from today. In case, any such application is moved within stipulated period, definitely, the same would be looked into, examined and redressed within four weeks thereafter but certainly after affording opportunity to all stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 11.12.2023 P.Sri. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.