- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 December 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 54474/2019
Judgment
Court No. - 73 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54474 of 2019 Applicant :- Palla And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Rohit Nandan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sundeep Shukla Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
¶1None is present on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. as well as Sri Sundeep Shukla, learned counsel for the informant are present.
¶2Learned counsel for the informant had made a submission before the Bar that in the Sessions Trial relating to this matter, the accused persons have been acquitted on merits by the trial court vide judgment and order dated 7.10.2021, hence the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
¶3Relying upon the submission made at the Bar by the learned counsel for the informant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 12.12.2023 ss High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.