- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Case no.
- A227 7507/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 81 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7507 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shivdas Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anjani Kumar Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
¶1Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Shweta Nishad, holding brief of Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 to 5.
¶2This petition under Article 227 has been filed challenging the order dated
15.03.2023, passed by the A.C.J.M. II, Gorakhpur on an application moved under section 156(3) Cr.P.C., whereby that application was dismissed.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that he had an alternative and suitable remedy to challenge the aforesaid order by filing a criminal revision, therefore, he is not desirous of proceeding with this petition filed under Article 227.
¶4In view of the above submission, this petition under Article 227 is dismissed as not pressed, giving liberty to the petitioner to seek alternative legal remedy as might be available to him. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Sumit Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.