- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Case no.
- A482 43735/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43735 of 2023 Applicant :- Jabbu Alias Imtiyas Ahmad And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Shankar,Triveni Shanker Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Pathak Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and Sri Anil Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
¶2Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that earlier he has filed Application U/S 482 No. 39140 of 2023 before this Court in which this Court vide order dated 1.11.2023 referred the matter for verification.
¶3In compliance of order dated 1.11.2023, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra has verified the said compromise deed entered between the parties on 8.11.2023.
¶4Sri Anil Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has not disputed the aforesaid facts and also submitted that in case aforesaid proceeding is quashed, he would have no objection.
¶5Learned AGA for the State has also not disputed the aforesaid facts.
¶6In view of above, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.
¶7Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another;
(2014) Supreme Today 642, entire proceedings of Case No. 4536 of 2005 (State vs. Iddu Ahmad and 2 Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 42 of 2003, under Sections 468, 452, 323, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra and charge-sheet dated 23.03.2005 and cognizance order dated 03.09.2005 are hereby quashed.
¶8The present application is, accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 Junaid High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.