Raj Kumar Bansal v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5188 of 2023 Revisionist :- Raj Kumar Bansal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Neeraj Srivastava,Alpika Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated

02.08.2023, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura in Misc. Case No.467 of 2023 (Raj Kumar Bansal v. Rukmani Mandal and 6 others), under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Vrindavan, District Mathura. Learned counsel for the revisionist states that his application under Section 156 (3) has been rejected without application of mind. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the present criminal revision has been preferred by learned counsel for revisionist. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances the learned counsel for the revisionist accepts that there is an alternative efficacious remedy of lodging complaint under section 190 Cr.P.C. In view of above, the criminal revision is disposed of with a direction that in case the revisionist moves an application u/s 190 Cr.P.C., the same may be considered in accordance with law. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 A.N. Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad